Fraudulent Government Stats
July 12, 2008 10:33 pm Raphael O'SunaMany people are aware that most of the economic statistics released by the government have been altered in ways which make them fraudulent.
There have been two main reasons why the US Government reports figures which are not reflective of reality. First of all, figures are made to look better than they are, in order to make Administrations seem more efficient and successful. Second, figures are fudged in order to cheat people out of what is rightfully theirs.
For example, had the government not changed the method of calculating the inflation rate in America over the past twenty-five years, a person receiving $1,000 per month in Social Security benefits would rather be receiving about $1,700 per month.
It is not so much that the government alters numbers–it doesn’t change 8%, say, to 6%; what it has done is to change formulas, indexes and what is included or excluded. In calculating the core rate of inflation, for example, upon which Social Security increases are based, statisticians now exclude the costs of energy and food! In other cases, statistics have simply not been reported.
Were we to return to the methods of calculating and reporting economic data, which were used in 1980, we would be shocked at the deterioration of America’s economic health and of the wealth and buying power of its citizens. In order to suppress public outrage, politicians simply changed the rules of measurement.
– Raphael O’Suna, Haiku


Psychic Advice :
Date: July 13, 2008 @ 3:28 am
Great blog, subscribed to your rss feed. Thanks.
Tim Aloi :
Date: July 14, 2008 @ 12:28 am
I agree according to the Gov. this is not a recession, and inflation is in check. I live on the east coast and we are just getting to the pricing Maui has had for food and gas. It is compounded by our sprawl and commute distances. I build start homes here and have seen people with good jobs struggle to get into a $160,000 house. They live week to week and now they are going under. I see them as with no place to turn and and no where to go. It helps me to understand to situation the Hawaiian people are in with there land, jobs, and culture. I would like nothing better than to see a limit place on number of water connections, number of allowed visitors at one time, and limit housing type and price to affordable levels for all Hawaiian Islands. It may sound socialistic but what going to happen when the water system fails, road system fails, and food shortage hits hard? I guess the Government will use a little creative math to prove your not hungry, have a affordable home, and your future looks bright. It is sad to see the changes in Maui I have witnessed in just 6 years. My heart goes out to each of you and hope your leaders once again look at what Maui is and protect it, her people, her land, and her resources.
Maui Cur. :
Date: July 14, 2008 @ 7:11 am
Your comments are well placed. I used to own a home on the East Coast, and know what you say is true.
The line between democracy and socialism is very blurred, and losing ground. Just this morning, in response to the housing credit fiasco of Fanny and Freddy Mae, the FED is taking control, and establishing stringent new lending rules. (Talk about shutting the barn door when all the horses have escaped!) Many of the programs sound much like socialist programs of the 60’s. Is this bad? Good? I don’t know. I know the similarity is unmistakable.